Question – Some people think that all university students should study whatever they like. Others believe that they should only be allowed to study subjects that will be useful in the future, such as those related to science and technology.
Discuss both these views and give your own opinion. Write atleast 250 words.
The question of whether university students should have the freedom to study any subject of their choice or be limited to disciplines with future utility is a subject of ongoing debate. One perspective argues for academic freedom, contending that students should have the liberty to explore their interests and passions. This viewpoint values the holistic development of individuals, fostering creativity and a diverse skill set beyond the confines of practicality.
On the other hand, proponents of a more pragmatic approach advocate for a curriculum focused on subjects deemed essential for future employability, particularly those related to science and technology. They argue that in a rapidly evolving job market, specialized knowledge in fields such as STEM (science, technology, engineering, and mathematics) is crucial for economic competitiveness and individual career success.
In my opinion, a balanced approach is essential. While it is valuable for students to pursue their passions, there is merit in incorporating practical considerations into the educational framework. A curriculum that combines core subjects essential for future employability with elective courses catering to individual interests strikes a balance. This approach ensures that students are equipped with both specialized skills and a well-rounded education that nurtures critical thinking and adaptability.
In conclusion, the dichotomy between academic freedom and practical utility underscores the complexity of university education. Striking a balance between allowing students to study their chosen subjects and emphasizing practical, future-oriented disciplines is pivotal for producing graduates who are not only well-equipped for the job market but also intellectually versatile and capable of contributing to society in multifaceted ways.