The Ielts Bridge

Author: IELTS BRIDGE

  • Do the dangers of chemicals in food production and preservation outweigh the advantages?

    Questions-Do the dangers of chemicals in food production and preservation outweigh the advantages? Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own experience or knowledge.

    Answer: Today, most foods sold in small stores and supermarkets contain chemicals to improve production and ensure the food lasts longer. However, there are concerns that these may have negative consequences. The risks associated with this, in my opinion, outweigh the benefits.

    Chemicals are added to food for a variety of reasons. First, it is to improve the product\’s appearance, which is accomplished through colorings, which encourage people to purchase food that would otherwise not look appealing to eat. Another reason is to preserve the food. So much of the food we eat would not last that long if it were not for the chemicals they contain, so again this is an advantage to the companies that sell food as their products have a longer shelf life.

    Therefore, this evidence shows that the main benefits are to the companies and not the customer. Although companies claim these food additives are safe and have research to support this, the study is possibly biased as it comes from their own companies or people with connections to these companies. It is common to read reports these days in the press about possible links to various health issues such as cancer. Food additives have also been linked to problems such as hyperactivity in children.

    To conclude, although there are benefits to placing chemicals in food, I believe that these principally help the companies but could be a danger to the public. It is unlikely that this practice can be stopped, so food must be clearly labeled, and I hope that organic products will become more readily available at reasonable prices.

  • Trend towards using alternative forms of medicine!

    Q-Currently, there is a trend toward using alternative forms of medicine. However, at best, these methods are ineffective, and at worst, they may be dangerous. To what extent do you agree with this statement? Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own experience or knowledge.

    ANSWER: Alternative medicine is not new. It is widely acknowledged that it predates conventional medicine and is still used by many people worldwide. I am not convinced that it is dangerous, and I believe that both alternative and traditional medicine can be beneficial.

    There are several reasons why the conventional medical community frequently dismisses alternatives: Because there has been little scientific research into such medicine, there is scarce evidence to support their supporters’ claims. People frequently try such treatment because of recommendations from friends, and as a result, they come to the therapist with a very positive attitude, which may be part of the cure. These therapies are usually only beneficial for long-term, chronic conditions. Acute medical problems, such as accidental injury frequently necessitate more traditional approaches.

    On the other hand, there are still compelling reasons to use alternatives. Despite the lack of scientific evidence, there is much anecdotal evidence that these therapies work. Furthermore, they frequently have few or no side effects far from dangerous, so the worst-case scenario is no change. One of the strongest arguments for the effectiveness of alternative therapies in the West is that, while conventional medicine is free, many people are willing to pay a high price for alternatives. It would be surprising if they continued to be unhelpful.

    I firmly believe that conventional medicine and alternative therapies can and should coexist. However, they have different strengths and can be used effectively to target particular medical problems. Therefore, the best situation would be for alternative therapies to support and complement conventional medicine.